The Australian reports…
“The Australian Christian Lobby’s Lyle Shelton has said Bill Shorten’s speech backing same sex marriage at their conference was “wide of the mark” because of his characterisation of Christians as people who invoke God and Bible to attack blended families and demonise people for who they love.
Mr Shelton has written a response to Bill Shorten’s speech at the conference last weekend.
At the conference, Mr Shorten backed same sex marriage.
Mr Shelton writes that the speech “raised eyebrows” for its characterisation of Christians.
“The debate about changing the definition of marriage has certainly been robust at times, but I have never heard anyone from our side use this kind of language. ACL certainly has not,” he writes.
“I was able to politely tell Mr Shorten this during the Q&A session. The disappointing thing is that mainstream media lapped up his comments with very little reporting on the social media hate campaign against ACL and the Hyatt Hotel.”
He writes that he is grateful to Opposition Leader Bill Shorten for speaking at their national conference at the weekend.
“Enormous pressure was put on him to stay away, such is the antipathy to free speech of many of those seeking to redefine marriage. When this failed, a vicious social media campaign was organised to have the venue, the Hyatt Hotel, cancel our conference. Thankfully Hyatt staff acted professionally and did a great job assisting us with what became our best conference yet.
“Mr Shorten showed courage to stare down the vitriol”.
The ANU’s John Warhurst commented yesterday in the Sydney Morning Herald that “the free speech credentials of the marriage-quality lobby” had been “threatened” by the actions of those seeking to shut down our conference.
“After years of difficult struggle in this debate, I’m glad this is finally coming to light. These tactics have successfully scared many Christians, and even leaders, away from participating in the public discourse on marriage”.
He writes that ACL does not agree with every political leader it engages. “But it is vital we engage, especially those who aspire to lead at the highest levels, as Mr Shorten does”.
“Apart from our disagreement on marriage, Mr Shorten was warm and genuine. I believe he has the best interests of our nation at heart. We look forward to continuing engagement”.