Brian Houston lashes Royal Commission counsel

 

The Sydney Morning Herald reports…

“…In evidence before the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse at the end of last year, Brian Houston said he’d had no inkling of his father’s dark secrets before October 1999.

He spoke of feeling shock and devastation, described how he had confronted his father at the first opportunity and – after convening a meeting of other AOG elders to discuss the crisis – forced Frank to stand aside (albeit on a pension) from further preaching duties.

But the counsel assisting the commission, Simeon Beckett, has taken a sterner view of the matter. Late last year he recommended Houston be referred to NSW police for failing to pass on that earliest claim of abuse (others involving at least six boys in New Zealand surfaced later). And he chastised Houston for failing to recognise the conflict of interest inherent in having carriage of the complaint against his father while also being head of Hillsong and head of the Assemblies of God.

Houston can barely contain his anger at Beckett’s recommendations. He maintains he respected the wishes of the victim, by then an adult, who had wanted the matter kept in-house; and that elders of the Assemblies of God had full knowledge and oversight of his handling of the affair.

Houston tells Good Weekend: “It didn’t really matter what the facts were, the counsel assisting [the commission] had his mind made up about what happened and never moved off it at any point….”

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Brian Houston lashes Royal Commission counsel

  1. Greg, you are mentioned in a recent post at donald elley’s repetitious and rambling blog (with mugshots). It seems to refer back to comments made late 2015. Not sure what purpose in dredging them up.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Well actually most institutions dealt with their abuse ‘in house’.

    Which is the sort of the whole point of the Commission.

    Like

  3. Given that the Commissions counsel would be concerned for the victims welfare and not Brian’s – of course they’re going to be focusing on Brian’s covering up of the issue. There is no ‘in house’ as far as child sexual abuse is concerned Brian, and if you don;t get that, then you really are a ‘twat’.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s